Bienvenidos a un encuentro con la diabetes tipo 1

"El objeto de este sitio es publicar novedades cientificas, relacionadas con prevencion, diagnostico, complicaciones, tratamiento de diabetes tipo 1, como asi tambien comunicar futuros eventos (congresos, jornadas, campamentos educativos, etc) en el pais e internacionales.
Dirigido a equipo de salud de atencion diabetologica (medicos, enfermeros, educadores, nutricionistas, asistentes sociales, profesores de educacion fisica, psicologos, podologos, etc.), empresas de medicina, pacientes y sus familiares."

sábado, 23 de mayo de 2020

Dr.Eduardo Bercovich: COVID-19: Antibodies




FROM NEJEM 


Testing: More Questions than Answers

Thomas Glück, MD reviewing 
A serologic test for antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein shows optimal specificity and sensitivity at day 14, but its prognostic role is unclear.
Researchers present data on the sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) test, which detects IgG antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein.
When the SARS-CoV-2 assay was used on 1020 deidentified serum specimens from 1010 different individuals submitted in 2018 and 2019 for serologic testing of other viral infections, specificity was 99.9%. When the assay was used on 689 samples obtained from 125 patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in March and April 2020, sensitivity was 53.1% at 7 days after the estimated day of symptom onset, 82.4% at 10 days, 96.9% at 14 days, and 100% at 17 days; sensitivity was 88.7% at 7 days after the date of PCR positivity, 97.2% at 10 days, 100% at 14 days, and 100% at 17 days. In a voluntary field test of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in Boise, Idaho, in late April 
2020, 1.8% of 4856 individuals tested positive with this test.

COMMENT

Given that >90% of adults aged 50 and older harbor antibodies to other circulating coronaviruses, the serologic test evaluated here shows excellent specificity and high sensitivity at 14 days after symptom onset. FDA emergency authorization recently was provided for this and other serologic tests for SARS-CoV-2. As Theel and colleagues recently outlined in a separate commentary article, various non–FDA-authorized tests with undocumented sensitivity and specificity are on the market, the results of which must be interpreted with caution. However, even the FDA-authorized tests use different antigens and formats. It is unclear to date which responses to which antigens occur first and whether a positive serologic test indicates protective immunity against reinfection or cessation of viral shedding (NEJM JW Infect Dis Jun 2020 and Clin Infect Dis 2020 Mar 21; [e-pub]; Clin Infect Dis 2020 Mar 28; [e-pub]; and J Med Virol 2020 Feb 27; [e-pub]). Currently, approved serologic tests for SARS-CoV-2 can be used, adjunctive to molecular tests but not alone, as diagnostic tools (Important Information on the Use of Serological (Antibody) Tests for COVID-19 — Letter to Health Care Providers. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2020 Apr 17). In the future we will need serologic tests for epidemiologic studies and for measuring responses to vaccines.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario